Knuckle-Walking Signal in the Manual Phalanges and Metacarpals of the Great Apes (Pan and Gorilla)

نویسندگان

  • Stacey Ann Matarazzo
  • Stacey A. Matarazzo
  • Laurie Godfrey
چکیده

To understand the role of knuckle walking in hominin evolution, we need to better understand behavioral variation in knuckle walking, and specifically whether behavioral similarities between chimpanzees and gorillas are likely homologous. Differences in how the hands of gorillas and chimpanzees contact the ground while knuckle walking have been noted but not quantified: it is widely believed that gorillas maintain a pronated arm and contact the ground with digits 2-5 consistently, while chimpanzees have variable arm position and digit contact. Distribution of pressure across the manus, peak digital pressures, and hand position were quantified to further test these generalizations. Chimpanzees and gorillas make initial ground contact with the ulnar aspect of the hand, and pressure then moves radially. They differ in which digit usually makes final contact and receives maximum pressure, and in hand position during contact. Gorillas regularly use a palm-back hand position and touch-off with digit 2. They show less variation in pressure application across the digits. Chimpanzees are more variable in hand position and pressure application. These differences may relate to aspects of locomotor behavior that are unrelated to knuckle walking; chimpanzees are more suspensory than gorillas. Nevertheless there are some commonalities that appear to be synapomorphic, and that would in any case require explanation if they do not signal knuckle walking in the common ancestor of chimpanzees and gorillas (and by implication, humans). In both, hand position plays a key role in determining which digit acts as the final touch-off element.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

News and Views Knuckle-walking hominid ancestors

Richmond & Strait (2000) have attracted much attention with a recent morphometric analysis of distal radii of anthropoids and hominid fossils, suggesting some of the latter share knuckle-walking traits. Several aspects of their treatment deserve comment. These authors show A.L. 288-1q,v and the putative hominid fossil KNM-ER 20419 falling near chimpanzees and gorillas in a canonical analysis of...

متن کامل

Trabecular Architecture of the Manual Elements Reflects Locomotor Patterns in Primates

The morphology of trabecular bone has proven sensitive to loading patterns in the long bones and metacarpal heads of primates. It is expected that we should also see differences in the manual digits of primates that practice different methods of locomotion. Primate proximal and middle phalanges are load-bearing elements that are held in different postures and experience different mechanical str...

متن کامل

Does Sympathy Motivate Prosocial Behaviour in Great Apes?

Prosocial behaviours such as helping, comforting, or sharing are central to human social life. Because they emerge early in ontogeny, it has been proposed that humans are prosocial by nature and that from early on empathy and sympathy motivate such behaviours. The emerging question is whether humans share these abilities to feel with and for someone with our closest relatives, the great apes. A...

متن کامل

The limits of endowment effects in great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus).

The endowment effect describes the bias that people often value things that they possess more than things they do not possess. Thus, they are often reluctant to trade items in their possession for items of equivalent value. Some nonhuman primates appear to share this bias with humans, but it remains an open question whether they show endowment effects to the same extent as humans do. We investi...

متن کامل

Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans.

Molecular data suggest that humans are more closely related to chimpanzees than either is to the gorillas, yet one finds the closest similarity in craniofacial morphology to be among the great apes to the exclusion of humans. To clarify how and when these differences arise in ontogeny, we studied ontogenetic trajectories for Homo sapiens, Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla and Pongo...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2014